Monday, July 30, 2012

The White Network Interview With Alex Linder...

Excellent interview by Carolyn and the The White News Network!:

Interview with Alex Linder

July 21, 2012

Alex Linder, creator of Vanguard News Network and Forum talks about himself, his work, his beliefs, and how he thinks White Nationalism should proceed in order to move into a successful future. Linder points to Greece’s Golden Dawn party as a model (along with Hitler’s National Socialist party in Germany), noting that it utilizes a good relationship with some police and military personnel and/or veterans. Linder notes that just talking and writing is not enough.

There were several questions and comments from listeners presented to Linder in the 2nd hour, which he answered. All in all, an information-dense program.

Please, if you enjoy this kind of programming, send your support to The White Network. Thank you for your support!

Saturday, July 28, 2012

From Voice of Reason Radio Network: The Nationalist Report: Update on South Africa with Marc Cornah

Another good show on the plight of White South Africa: The Nationalist Report / The Nationalist Report: Update on South Africa with Marc Cornah

The Nationalist Report: Update on South Africa with Marc Cornah

July 16, 2012

Blacks shouting ''Kill the Boer''

The Nationalist Report returns!  Mishko Novosel & Mike Conner interview returning guest Marc Cornah.  Topics include:

  • The situation in the Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB) of South Africa since Terre’Blanche’s assassination;
  • Update on the criminal trial against Terre’Blanche’s assassins;
  • The current (relatively speaking) lack of violence–the “calm before the storm”;
  • How South Africa’s immigration invasion is making a bad situation worse;
  • China’s economic/colonial designs on Africa;
  • South Africa’s impending future, its relevance to Whites, and the need to spread the word.

Marc Cornah is the leader of the Cape region of the Afrikaner Resistance Movement (AWB) of South Africa. To contact Marc, write to .  

13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 57 min.

Contact Mishko
Contact Mike

(Note: In order to listen to this broadcast click on the title of this article. To hear more great shows from Voice of Reason, click the link at the bottom of this blog and also send them some support. Thank you!)

A Message to White Christians by Dr. William L. Pierce

A Message to White Christians by Dr. William L. Pierce Dr.Pierce even addresses the role of the churches in White South Africa  (See related article below; White Genocide In South Africa....White South Africa Wake Up!):
A Meesage to White Christians by Dr. William L. Pierce

The Jewish Supremacy Court by Clay Farrell


                            The Jewish Supremacy Court


by Clay Farrell


Something  you have not heard much about yet but will hear a little about the rest of this  month is the Senate confirmation hearings of President Obama’s second Supreme  Court nomination, Solicitor General Elena Kagan. Nationalist MattersThe Senate confirmation hearings began this week and the  Constitution-mandated nomination confirmation proceeding, which is headed by  the Senate Judiciary Committee, will go through the motions of a question-and-answer,  dog and pony show, prior to the official Senate nomination confirmation in mid-July.                                                

With a Judiciary Committee, which is over 60% Democrat, and  Senate, which is almost 60% Democrat, this nomination is not at risk of failure  for many reasons beyond a Democrat-controlled process.  Another  is the overall popularity of President Obama. But regardless, this Supreme Court Justice  nomination will be, if you excuse my deliberately contemporary urban  expression, another slam-dunk for Obama.   But that is not necessarily because of the Obaminator’s popularity or  the Democrat-controlled  Senate.


For sure there has been lot of other news dominating the  controlled-media agenda in recent months, including the Gulf of Mexico oil  spill and news regarding the war in Afghanistan. But that is nothing more than  a coincidental and convenient distraction from Elena Kagan’s nomination. 


Ultimately nothing would make any difference with this  nomination.  And I can assure you that  Presidential popularity, Senate political predisposition, and less-than-convenient  news distractions, would not stop it.  The fact is that Elena Kagan is yet another Jewish appointment  to the Supreme Court that has had a virtually non-stop Jewish presence for  almost 100 years now.


The Jewish appointments to the Supreme Court did not start  until the 20th century when Jewish  influence in this country really solidified.  You do not need to be a historian to really  footnote the time period in which Jewish influence on Washington became  overwhelmingly obvious and Supreme Court appointments reflected this influence.


The political Zionist movement was around for decades,  centuries if you want to go Rabbinical on us, and the concept of the DiasporaNationalist Matters   even longer.  Jewish influence in  Washington correlates with both.  Subsequently,  so does Jewish influence and dominance within the controlled mass-media.  The support Britain and the United States  gave to Zionism led to the 1917 Balfour Declaration which created Israel.  As we will see, that too has connections to  Jewish appointments to the US Supreme Court.   The support and traction Israel received throughout its life came as  Jewish influence in Washington and London grew.   With this, so came the increased frequency of Jewish representation on the Supreme  Court.


All of the Jewish Supreme Court Justices were appointed in  the 20th century or beyond.  It  was not until the 20th century that our federal government, the system of  government set up by ourNationalist Matters  Founding Fathers, became terminally corrupt.  Two completely fratricidal World Wars claiming  the lives of some of the best human and genetic stock our race has ever  produced, the rise of the near-monopoly Jewish ownership of our mass-media, the  rise of Israel, the rise of the United States government’s complete, unwavering  support and obedience to Israel, all happened in the 20th century.


There was a brief Jewish absence on the Supreme Court starting  in the late 1960’s.  But it was precisely  that period of American history, the period during and following the culturally  turbulent and even socially revolutionary 1960’s and 1970’s, that the Jewish dominance, ownership,  and control of our mass media began to manifest to a point of irrefutable  potency. It was this period of American history that Jewish monopoly-control of  our mass media grew to the point it is now; a point of sacrosanct superiority.  The absence of direct Jewish influence on the  Supreme Court paled in importance to this monumental Jewish-achievement.


My point is that Ginsburg, Breyer, and now Kagan, are merely  examples of the deliberate and successful aftermath of twenty years of  increased Jewish influence on our society.   The very important Supreme Court “Jewish seat”, remained empty for a  couple of decades until Bill Clinton obliged with his two Jewish appointments.  The fact that BOTH of his appointments were Jewish  was not even a topic for debate or concern.   And neither will it be a point of concern now as Elena Kagan is ushered  onto the Supreme Court, the THIRD Jew to sit on the current Supreme Court.


This is not only a monumental testament of  Jewish-achievement it is a colossal failure for the rest of us.  European-Americans, every one of us, share in  the responsibility of this failure and we need to understand how and why it  happened.  But first we also need to put  it into perspective and understand what having a disproportionately Jewish  Supreme Court means.


Many years ago I was compelled to take several courses in  Political Science to satisfy my undergraduate degree requirements.  While I was not necessarily looking forward to  the subject, the hours  I spent expanded on the rudimentary government and social science knowledge I  unintentionally picked up in the public schools.  It turned out to be pretty interesting and I  did well in the subject.


I can still remember one lecture in particular that still sticks  out in my mind.  We were discussing the  powers of the President, or the Executive branch, of the United States of  America.  The professor made a point that  was both provocative and vexing for my young and impressionable mind. 


During the lecture, the point was clearly made that the  President was not an all-powerful position and had a fairly high degree of  oversight by Congress.  But that was old news from my public  school days.  The point from that lecture  that really stood out then and now was speculation as to what the most powerful  authority of the American Presidency actually was.  The professor simply asked what was the most  influential and enduring authority or privilege wielded by the President of the  United States.  The professor, a White, tenured  member of the university, holding a PhD in Political Science, offered that  perhaps it was the power of the president to nominate federal judges, including  to the federal courts of appeals and to the Supreme Court that was the single  most influential and lasting power.


Nationalist Matters Based on Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2, of the US  Constitution, the President “shall have power, by and with the advice and  consent of the Senate, …. shall appoint……judges of the Supreme Court”.  With the simple Senate majority confirmation,  the Presidential nomination is confirmed and the Supreme Court Justice is  appointed.  Once appointed, a Supreme  Court Justice has tenure for life.  That  means effectively that a Supreme Court Justice serves virtually for as long as  they want to; until they die, resign, retire, or otherwise violate the  prescribed “good Behavior.”  If you  understand one of the roles of the Supreme Court is interpreting what is and is  not “Constitutional”, this is a pretty powerful and influential role.


I remember clearly that the professor did not state this as  a matter of fact, but hinted that it was a matter of his own opinion.  He noted that the answer was really not a  matter of Constitutional law.  He posed  it more as a question allowing us to draw our own conclusions and to formulate  our own opinions. That alone was enough to firmly plant this subject in my young  and impressionable mind.  And right or  wrong, I too am of the opinion that the Executive authority to nominate federal  judges, especially to the Supreme Court, is the most lasting and influential  authority yielded by the president.Nationalist Matters  We  could debate and argue that other authorities offered to the office of the President  are or are not more powerful but that is not the important point right now.


The important point is that President Barrack Obama will  have his second opportunity since taking office in January 2009 to nominate a  Supreme Court Justice.  With his first  nomination, which was quickly confirmed by the Senate, Obama put the first  Hispanic woman on the Supreme Court.   With his second nomination Obama will have an opportunity to put yet another  Jew on the Supreme Court;  the first of the 21st century but certainly not the first.


Barrack Obama’s second Supreme Court Justice nomination, Elena  Kagan (pictured left), will make for the eighth Jewish Nationalist Matters Supreme court Justice to sit on the  highest court in this country throughout its relatively short history.  As mentioned earlier, all of these Jewish  Supreme Court Justices were appointed and served during the 20th century or  later.  Elena Kagan would be the first  Jewish Supreme Court Justice appointed in the 21st century, but the century is  still young.  So throughout the history  of the Supreme Court, which was established in 1789, from George Washington’s  original appointments to the current administrations appointments, it was not  until the year before America entered the first World War that a Jew sat on the  Supreme Court.


In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson, was the first to appoint  a Jew to the Supreme Court, as well as the first to lie to the American people  in order to get this country into a World War.   Wilson appointed Nationalist Matters Louis Dembitz Brandeis (pictured right), who was an open Zionist and the  son of radical Jews from Eastern Europe.   Brandeis joined the Zionist movement in 1912 and at one point was the Chairman  of Provisional Committee for General Zionist Affairs.  According to The Universal Jewish  Encyclopedia, in 1917, Louis Dembitz Brandeis discussed the Zionist problem and  solutions in detail, outlining “all the phases of the Zionist problem” with  Lord Balfour.  A few months later the Balfour  Declaration was signed and Palestine was cut up to form a “national home for  the Jewish people” marking the birth of modern Israel. 


There is no doubt that one of the driving forces and factors  behind Brandeis’  presence on the Supreme Court was his devotion to Judaism, particularly from a  Zionist perspective.  While the term  “communist” at that time was really only used to describe those involved with  violent, revolutionary changes, Brandeis would today be considered a communist  or at least a communist sympathizer.  Many  believe that it was, at least in part, the influence and opinion of Brandeis  that led Wilson to lobby Congress to declare war on Germany in 1917.  For sure, Wilson’s inaugural-Jewish-appointment  to the Supreme Court changed the course of this country, in more ways than  one.  Louis Dembitz Brandeis became a  leading Zionist force in the US and in the development of Israel as a new home  for the Jews.


President Wilson’s appointment of a radical Jew, the first  ever to sit on the Supreme Court, did not go without resistance though.  But President Wilson was persistent and his  loyalty to Brandeis was clear.  Wilson  tried to appoint Brandeis to be his Attorney General and later the Secretary of  Commerce.  He backed off of those  appointments due to outcry against it.   Once nominated to the Supreme Court, Brandeis’ nomination was hotly challenged.


Louis Dembitz Brandeis was called a radical and much more  and he faced what another Jewish Supreme Court Justice would later call an  “openly anti-Semitic” reception, both on the Court and beyond.  In fact, according to the 1940 version of the  Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, the appointment and confirmation of Brandeis  resulted in a historic battle.  It was actually  Brandeis’ ‘radicalism’ that  prompted the debate.  Eventually a  petition was presented to the Senate to deny the appointment.  The petition was signed by “seven former  presidents of the American Bar Association, a former Secretary of State, and  William Howard Taft, former President of the United States” as well as the  President of Harvard.  However, none of  the protests won-out and Brandeis, one of the world’s greatest advocates of the Jewish takeover of  Palestine, became a Justice on the Supreme Court. 


Once President Wilson and Justice Louis Dembitz Brandeis  shattered that once impenetrable Jewish-glass ceiling, exactly six more US  Presidents would add to the list of Jewish Supreme Court Justices.  Some of those are worth at least a quick  review because I think that it helps put the latest Supreme Court Justice  appointment into perspective.  It will  also allow us to draw some important conclusions about what to expect now and  in the future.


In 1932, over a dozen years after Wilson appointed Brandeis  but while Justice Brandeis was still serving, President Herbert Hoover  appointed Nationalist Matters Benjamin N. Cardozo (pictured left) to the Supreme Court.  Cardozo was a member of the Zionist  Organization of America.  It was the radical  pioneer Hebraic Supreme Court Justice  Dembitz Brandies that really encouraged and guided Cardozo into the  Zionist movement.  But being an ardent  Zionist Jew was not enough to prevent appointment to the high court.


At that time, Zionism had really become a politically-correct  subject and it was not really until Zionism and Communism collided that the  political correctness of Zionism started to lose its luster. But it was not  until the 1950s and McCarthyism that these two isms really started to lose  public popularity.  Interestingly enough,  back then it was okay  to be a Zionist, but  being Jewish would not  win you much popularity.   The times did start changing though and during those early decades preceding  and following the WWII era, long before Stephen Spielberg historians and  Hollywood made their mark on the history books and collective attitudes and  opinions of the American public, Jews had made some good friends in Washington.


Once Washington became properly indoctrinated in the will of  the Tribe, the frequency of Jewish Supreme Court Justices picked up.  In 1939, as an appointment of President  Franklin Roosevelt, Felix Frankfurter Nationalist Matters   (below right) became the third Jew to be appointed and  confirmed to the Supreme Court.  This was  the same year the country’s first Jewish Supreme Court Justice, Justice Louis  Brandeis, would retire from the court.   And as ironic of a historic coincidence that may appear, it was Justice Brandeis  who got Justice Frankfurter more involved and familiar with Zionism.  And objective historians will note that it  was Justice Brandeis retirement that brought in Justice Frankfurter, an often  repeated Jewish quid pro quo for a Jewish seat on the Court.


A quick review of Justice Frankfurter’s resume leads to the  same conclusions as does a quick review of Brandeis’s resume.  A liberal activist, Frankfurter was a founder  of the American Civil Liberties Union, an advisory lawyer and member of the  National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and much,  much more.  He too could be considered a  communist or at least a communist sympathizer.   Just like Justice Cardozo, Justice Frankfurter followed the opinion and  advice of Justice Brandeis to become a member of the Zionist Organization of  America.  Furthermore, in 1917 Justice Brandeis  and Felix Frankfurter lobbied President Wilson to support the Balfour  Declaration.  A year later, in 1918, Frankfurter  was a participant in the founding of the American Jewish Congress.


Nationalist MattersIt should be obvious but also noted that President Franklin  Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson had more in common than just the  appointments of Jews to the Supreme Court, Wilson with the first, Roosevelt  with the third.  Both (pictured left) of these US  Presidents lied to the American people in order to get this country into a  World War.  Both ran an election campaign  promising to keep America out of these World Wars and both quickly broke these  promises once in office.  Of course, both  also had Jews whispering in their ears to help guide them through it all.  For sure, you cannot rely on Spielbergian  historians to draw some fairly obvious and valid conclusions about these two  men, these two Presidents, the entrance of America into these two World Wars,  and the presence and influence of Jews in Washington, including the Supreme  Court.  You just have to do a little  research and keep an independent mind and the dots connect pretty quickly and  clearly.


The same year Frankfurter was to retire and leave the  Supreme Court down one Jew, 1962 to be exact, President John F. Kennedy would  appoint the Nationalist Matters fourth Jew to the Supreme Court, Justice Arthur Joseph Goldberg (pictured right).  Like Frankfurter before him, Goldberg was an  advocate for the rights and protection of organized labor and attributed with  the union-merger that created the AFL-CIO.   You do not have to be a Marxist-scholar or Labor historian to see the  common thread between communism and the origins of labor unions in this  country.  But you do have to think a  little bit to connect all the Jewish influence - influence independent of any political party or  event.


Another point worth mentioning about Justice Goldberg is the  fact that he was a religious Jew, a so called “practicing Jew”, a Yeshiva boy,  and held true to religious ceremonies and traditions.  His Tribal predecessors, Brandeis, Cardozo,  and Frankfurter, were not.  The only  importance to that fact is to note the irrelevance of actively practicing  Judaism to understanding the power and influence of Jews.  To a very large extent, it is a non-factor  for us.  Don’t get confused and misguided  by the ideological fly-paper of religion when you attempt to understand or  communicate anything regarding  Jews.


By the time Arthur Goldberg was appointed and confirmed to  the Supreme Court, Spielbergian history was still in its infancy but it would soon  start to grow exponentially.  If you  follow the career of Justice Goldberg close enough you will learn a great deal  about his influence on both this country, but also Israel.  At one point, during WWII, Goldberg was  actually an international CIA spy.  Technically  he was a spy for The Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the WWII era  predecessor of the CIA.  Beyond those  golden years, Justice Goldberg would eventually become the President of the  American Jewish Committee and was of course another faithful Zionist.


In fact, after his short tenure on the Supreme Court, he was  appointed by President Johnson (pictured left with Goldberg) to be the American Ambassador to the United  Nations.  Nationalist Matters That alone was extraordinary  enough; going from an appointment for-life on the Supreme Court to a US  ambassador to the UN.  Factor in  international espionage with all of that and the extraordinary becomes the  phenomenal, or shocking depending which way you spin your dreidl.


As the ambassador to the UN, the timing coincided nicely  with The Six Day War, which was the single event that would catapult Israel  from her 1948 small-state status to the most powerful country in the Middle  East.  The Six Day War allowed Israel to  expand its borders dramatically, capturing Jerusalem, the Sinai, the Gaza strip,  the West Bank and more.  These are areas  still hotly contested today.  When Israel  pulled its attack, which by the way included the attack on the USS Liberty,  Ambassador Goldberg instantly and ferociously backed Israel’s play at the  United Nations claiming Egypt "fired the first shot."  A claim that never held scrutiny historically  and was always refuted by Egypt and the rest of Israel’s enemies, but was  enough to allow for Israeli success during The Six Day war.


When Kennedy was assassinated and replaced by President  Lyndon Baines Johnson, Justice Goldberg was tapped on the shoulder to be the  new Ambassador to the United Nations.  In  what has seemed to be another Jewish quid pro quo, Johnson would appoint the  Jewish Abe Fortas, another noted Zionist.


Fortas was a lawyer that defended Jews in the 1950s targeted  under the McCarthyism efforts.  Certainly  a Jew’s Jew, Justice  Fortas was plagued with ethics issues but that did not stop President Johnson  from attempting to appoint Justice Abe Fortas (pictured right) to be the first Jewish Supreme  Court Chief Justice Nationalist Matters.  But that one was  met with too much resistance, resulting in a Senate filibuster.  Much of the resistance was based on an ethics  investigation involving a Jewish Wall Street financier, Louis Wolfson, who had  put Justice Fortas on a $20,000 per-year for-life retainer.  This proved too much for Fortas who would soon  after resign from the court.


That seemed to end the continuous “Jewish seat” fulfillment  on the Supreme Court.  The controversial  and embarrassing episode with Justice Fortas would leave the Supreme Court  Jew-less, or non-Kosher, for over twenty years.


That was an extremely significant twenty years when it comes  to Jewish influence on American society, from politics, government, culture,  law, and virtually everything in between.   The Jewish controlled mass media laid its foundation and grew.  But at the same time, the seemingly obvious Jewish  quid pro quo system that kept a Kosher Supreme Court, even a Zionist, Kosher  Supreme Court, for over half a century, seemed to hit a gap.  The gap started in 1969 with the resignation  of Justice Abe Fortas.  For sure this gap  did not extend beyond the Supreme Court and Jewish influence on American  society really did not slow.  But for the  Supreme Court, Washington just needed some extra Jewish inspiration to fill  that gap which quickly came.


That inspiration would come in a serious way from the  election of William Jefferson Clinton, Slick Willy for those that know him  best.  President Bill Clinton would appoint the two Jews now  sitting on the current Supreme Court. But that was merely a small contribution  Bill Clinton would make to revive the official Jewish influence and presence of  Jews in Washington.  Additionally, his  nearly 100% Kosher National Security Council, his Kosher Senior Directors and  Advisors, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, and on and on, would  dramatically accelerate Jewish influence in Washington.  It was simply stunning. President Bill  Clinton had such a Jewish saturated administration it would make President  Franklin Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson blush.  But that is old news to all of us by now, or  at least I hope it is.


In 1993, Slick Willy appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg (pictured left) to the  Supreme Court.  A year later, in 1994,  Slick Willy would appoint Stephen Breyer (pictured below, right with Clinton) to the Nationalist Matters Supreme Court.  Both Jewish, both are millionaires and both would  go a long way to play catch-up on the “Jewish seat” fulfillment. Despite the fulfillment of the Supreme Court “Jewish  seat”, which had remained empty for almost two and a half decades, the fact  that Ginsburg and Breyer were in fact Jewish and fulfilling this  semi-compulsory Jewish seat was not even a topic of debate or discussion.


This is an important point.   As Justice Ginsburg stated during a speech at the Touro Synagogue  discussing her and Breyer’s appointments, “both of us take pride in, and draw  strength from, our heritage, but our religion simply was not relevant to (our) appointments.”  But it is precisely the pride and strength of  their Jewish heritage that we should be worried about.  It is the same pride and strength that drove Brandeis,  Cardozo, Frankfurter, Goldberg, and Fortas before Ginsburg and Breyer started  serving.


For starters, Ruth Ginsburg’s maternal grandfather was an  ultra-Orthodox Jew who once destroyed his son’s bicycle when he was caught  riding it on the Sabbath.  Justice  Ginsburg virtually abandoned Judaism mostly because of its slant against women  and its exclusion of them from important rituals.  When she says religion is not relevant she  means it.  But likewise, despite the  religion of Judaism and it’s somewhat sexist biases (shame on you Abraham!)  Ginsberg is very proud to be a Jew and she is not ashamed to admit it and embraces  the Jewish worldview on matters.  Justice  Ginsburg is a vocal and active feminist and was once Director of the ACLU’s Women’s  Rights Project. 


At one point Ginsberg applied for a clerkship under Supreme  Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. You remember him, the liberal activist, NAACP  lawyer, member of the Zionist Organization of America, and third Jewish Supreme  Court Justice.  Frankfurter apparently  turned Ginsburg down because it was Nationalist Matters not standard for Justices to have female  clerks at that time.  Her Clintonista  peer, Justice Stephen Breyer, once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Arthur  Goldberg.  You remember him, the faithful  Zionist, religious Jew, international spy, point-man at the UN during The Six  Day War, the President of the American Jewish Committee, and the fourth Jewish  Supreme Court Justice.  Also, I think I  already mentioned, according to the Jewish news weekly, Justice Ginsburg and  Justice  Breyer are “far and away the  richest justices” on the Supreme Court (and we are talking ranges in the $14-24  million!)


So now we are set to add to the existing Jewish held Supreme  Court seats with President Obama’s nomination of Elena Kagan.  This would be the third Jewish Justice  sitting on the current Supreme Court, unparalleled in the history of this  country.  So with a representation of  roughly 2% of the entire United States citizenry, the Jews would represent the  Supreme Court with over 30% of the Justices.   Once again, with the popularity of Obama and the strong Democrat majority  in the Senate, this Supreme Court nomination will not meet anything more than a  formality of resistance.


While  the Rabbinical Alliance of America is saying Kagan is not Kosher enough for its  tastes, albeit the same tastes that alienated Ginsberg, don’t let any of that  fool you.  A bit more reveling to me but  ultimately irrelevant as to the course of action coming, Elena Kagan has called  the President of the Supreme Court of Israel, Aharon Barak, her personal "judicial  hero" but that won’t matter in the end (read more about Aharon Barak here).   Even though President Aharon Barak has been called the most activist  judge in the world, and that by fellow Jews, even though he considers himself a  Zionist, none of that will matter.   Despite the fact that soon to be Justice Kagan has absolutely no  judicial experience, has never argued a case in front of a jury, has never been  a judge (incidentally, making her the first Supreme Court nominee in almost 40  years to not have been a judge), it simply does not matter.


Nationalist Matters What does matter?   Well it does not hurt that she seems to at odds with “Don’t ask don’t tell” or anything not warmly embracing of homosexuality,  at least leaning toward pro-abortion, typically an opponent for gun rights, all  of which curry favor with the Obama administration and the rest of the Kosher  crew in charge, a noted political animal that earned her stripes within the  Clinton administration, that does not really matter either.  What matters is that she is Jewish.  She is Jewish and the third Jew to sit on the  court, perhaps in preparation for the fossilized Justice Ginsberg to retire  with confidence.


What should matter to you?   That she is Jewish.  Period.  Who cares whether or not she takes her Happy  Meal Kosher or whether she attends synagogue and refuses to ride her bike on  the Sabbath. The fact that she is another Jew and she is about to be sitting as  a Justice on the highest court in the land; the Supreme Court of the United  State of America.  And if you disagree  with me and my former Political Science professor and do not think sitting on  the Supreme Court is all that important, you probably should do a little more  research on the matter.


According to Justice Ruth Ginsberg herself, the Jews  certainly think it is important and almost always have.  She was describing the man who almost became  the first Jewish Supreme Court Justice, beating Brandeis to that spot by almost  sixty years.  Speaking at a synagogue,  Ginsberg described Judah Benjamin (pictured right)Nationalist Matters, a US Senator from Louisiana who in 1853 declined  his nomination to the Supreme Court preferring to stay in the Senate  instead.  In 2004, Justice Ginsberg  proudly proclaimed that Judah Benjamin suffered through “virulent anti-Semitism”  but opted away from the Supreme Court because it “had not yet become the  co-equal branch of Government it is today”. 


The fact that we will soon have the third sitting Jewish  Supreme Court Justice is not a coincidence.   The fact that President Barrack Obama’s second nomination to the Supreme  Court is Jewish, is not a coincidence.   The fact that of the three people to make it onto President Obama’s so  called “short list” of potential Supreme Court Justices, two were Jewish, is  not a coincidence.  The fact that this  would be the eighth Jewish Supreme court Justice, is not a coincidence.  The fact that the Supreme Court has had a  virtually non-stop Jewish presence for almost a century now, is not a  coincidence.  The correlation of the  appointment of Zionist Jewish Supreme Court Justices and the birth of Israel is  not a coincidence.  The disproportional  presence of Jews in our Federal government, including Presidential  administrations, Congress, and the Supreme Court, is not a coincidence.  Predominant Jewish influence and control of  our mass media, is not a coincidence.  The  fact that they are Jews and have cleverly and consistently positioned  themselves in these positions of power and influence is not a coincidence.


And as mentioned earlier, don’t let the concept of  “religion” confuse you or be used to obfuscate the reality of being  Jewish.  Sure, Judaism is a well  established religion but being Jewish does not mean you practice Judaism or  that you have any clue as to a single tenet of that religion.  You are born Jewish and may or may not  practice the Jewish religion of Judaism.   This is a very simple and obvious point but a point used to keep people  confused about what Jews do.


So if you hear anybody in the government or media use the  concept of religion in characterizing Jews, know they are lying to you and that  is also not a coincidence.  When the  media talks about the latest Jew’s qualifications for the Supreme Court and preoccupies that  coverage with discussion about her feelings on the military’s “don’t ask, don’t  tell policy”, know they are just trying to misdirect attention from more  important issues.  When the media makes  nothing more than a whimsical chuckle about her being Jewish and more in light  of her religious orientation, know they are deliberately deceiving you.


One more time, two completely fratricidal World Wars, the  continuing nomination of more Jewish Supreme Court Justices, the rise of the  near-monopoly Jewish control and ownership of our mass-media, the rise of  Israel as an empire in the Middle East, our government’s unwavering support and  obedience to Israel, all happened in 20th century and are all related.  You can NOT separate these variables from the  appointment of 100% of the Jewish Supreme Court Justices.  All of these variables are 100% related and  intertwined and you do not have to be a historical scholar to connect all the  dots.  You just have to be willing to  take the time to research and think about it.


When you see media coverage of nomination of Elena Kagan  keep all of this in mind. Understand that a Supreme Court Justice has a defined  role to help us, you and me, understand and interpret the Constitution, where  our Civil Liberties are defined.  Where Freedom  of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of Press, Freedom of Religion, the  right to own firearms, and so much more are defined; within the  Constitution.  It is the Supreme Court  that decides how we must interpret all of this.   This is a VERY powerful position to be in and The Tribe knows this well, perhaps much better than us.

Found Here

White Genocide In South Africa....White South Africa Wake Up!

Warning! Graphic Images Below.

Genocide Watch Issues Alert: South Africa In Early Stages Of White Genocide

Jul 27, 2012 2 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

World’s top genocide expert and founder of Genocide Watch, Prof. Gregory Stanton, visits South Africa to investigate violence against whites (Afrikaners). He warns them at a press conference on July 26 2012: “Don’t give up your guns.”

“UN’s Francis Deng has been informed; and I will also inform Samantha Power, head of the US Atrocities Prevention Board, as well as the FBI’S Genocide Prevention Unit upon my return.”   – Prof. Gregory Stanton, World’s Top Genocide expert, founder Genocide Watch

July 26, 2012, 11am  PRETORIA – Press conference by Prof Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch US in  South Africa: as reported by dr Dan Roodt of the Pro-Afrikaans-Action-Group:

- Stanton said he was on a fact-finding mission regarding the extraordinarily high numbers of cruelty displayed during attacks and murders against white farmers, their families and workers; and also interviewed community leaders about the widespread anti-Afrikaner discrimination and hatespeech emanating from the ANC-regime.

“Genocide Watch had raised South Africa to level 6 when Malema was singing Kill the Boer song’. And now SA president Jacob Zuma is also singing it.”

He said at the start of his press conference that he had tried to get interviews with ANC-leaders specifically to discuss the hatespeech issue surround the Kill the Boer song. He was refused access. “I would have dearly loved to have spoken to them’;  he said at the well-attended press conference at the Transvaal Agricultural Union’s headquarters in Silverton, Pretoria.

“We at Genocide Watch have enough suspicion that there may be an organised effort at a genocide in South Africa, and we will continue to monitor the situation closely’.

“Desecration of bodies in SA also happened in Rwanda and Burundi”, he said — adding that he would be meeting the US Minister of Council today to inform them of the situation in South Africa”. He had spoken to many Afrikaners from all walks of life and is returning with hitherto-unknown details about atrocities.

“You only need a small group to carry out a full-blown genocide. When I talked about the 8 stages of genocide, some of the early stages are precursors to genocide’.

“The SA farm murders should become ‘a priority crime’ for the South African government, and that they had to try their very best to try and stop them.

Many of the Afrikaners present also asked him exactly what genocide entailed. He explained that for instance, ‘if the government took away your children and prevented you from speaking Afrikaans to them, it is a genocide act. “And driving people out of their territory is also another form of genocide.’ Also: “Killing members of a group, even 3,000, could constitute a genocide.’

Asked by Edwin Leemans of the Boereleed Institute whether the ANC-leaders could be taken to the International criminal court in the Hague to be tried, he replied “South Africa is a state-party to the Rome Statute. Policians could be tried in The Hague regarding their inflammatory speech towards Afrikaners.’

Stanton said he had spoken to community leaders and crime-victims during his fact-finding tour in South Africa.

‘Francis Deng of the United Nations has also taken notice of what is happening in South Africa to the Afrikaners.” He also undertook to take all the information he had gathered on his fact-finding tour in South Africa to Samantha Power, head of the US Atrocities Prevention Board, as well as to the FBI’S Genocide Prevention Unit.  

He did not express any political views – for instance regarding the rights of Afrikaners to self-determination – as posed by Cor Ehlers.

And one Afrikaner at the press conference challenged Stanton, saying he was ‘skeptic’ about Stanton’s claims:  Johan Burger of the Institute for Security Studies and a former SA Police Commissioner, asked: “what is the factual basis for the assumptions we are making’? Stanton explained that similar incredulity was seen in Europe and the USA regarding reports about any pending Afrikaner genocide.

“The godlike status of Mandela is like that of Martin Luther King or Ghandi. We now know they were not perfect. Nevertheless, as long as Mandela is alive, Europe and the US will not believe the situation in which Afrikaners now find themselves in South Africa.”

He expressed the hope that ‘war would never happen in South Africa: that you will be able to fight back against the communist ideology’.  He also urged the Afrikaners to ‘fight back using the courts and the policing system, and ‘for God’s sake don’t ever give up your guns, despite the gun laws.’


About Gregory Stanton: Gregory H. Stanton is the Research Professor in Genocide Studies and Prevention at George Mason University in Fairfax County, Virginia, United States. He is the best known for his work in the area of genocide studies. He is the founder (1999) and president of Genocide Watch, the founder (1981) and director of the Cambodian Genocide Project, and the founder (1999) and Chair of the International Campaign to End Genocide. From 2007 to 2009 he was the President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars.

Stanton comes from the lineage of women’s suffrage activist Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Henry Brewster Stanton, an anti-slavery leader. He worked as a voting rights worker in Mississippi, a Peace Corps Volunteer in the Ivory Coast, and as Church World Service/CARE Field Director in Cambodia in 1980.

Stanton is Research Professor in Genocide Studies and Prevention at the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia. From 2003 to 2009 he was the James Farmer Professor in Human Rights at the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia. He has been a Law Professor at Washington and Lee University, American University, and the University of Swaziland. He has degrees from Oberlin College, Harvard Divinity School, Yale Law School, and a Doctorate in Cultural Anthropology from the University of Chicago. He was a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (2001–2002).

Stanton served in the State Department (1992–1999), where he drafted the United Nations Security Council resolutions that created the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Burundi Commission of Inquiry, and the Central African Arms Flow Commission. He also drafted the U.N. Peacekeeping Operations resolutions that helped bring about an end to the Mozambique civil war. In 1994, Stanton won the American Foreign Service Association’s prestigious W. Averell Harriman award for “extraordinary contributions to the practice of diplomacy exemplifying intellectual courage,” based on his dissent from U.S. policy on the Rwandan genocide. He wrote the State Department options paper on ways to bring the Khmer Rouge to justice in Cambodia.

In 1999 Stanton founded Genocide Watch. From 1999 to 2000, he also served as Co-Chair of the Washington Working Group for the International Criminal Court. Genocide Watch is the Chair and Coordinator of the International Campaign to End Genocide, which includes 30 organizations in 11 countries, including the Minority Rights Group, the International Crisis Group, the Aegis Trust, Survival International, and the Genocide Intervention Network.

Before he joined the State Department, Stanton was a legal advisor to RUKH, the Ukrainian independence movement, work for which he was named the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America’s 1992 Man of the Year. He was the Chair of the American Bar Association Young Lawyer’s Division Committee on Human Rights and a member of the A.B.A.’s Standing Committee on World Order Under Law.

In 2007, Stanton was elected President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, to serve until 2009.

Found Here