Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Irving Kristol, Rot In Pieces.
Good riddance to more bad rubbish. Named by 'Kwans as the "godfather of neo-conservatism", who once was a strong Trotskyite keels over by lung cancer:
Picture of the dead Jewish Supremacist:
Article Found Here
Sunday, September 13, 2009
The Best Congress AIPAC Can Buy by Philip Giraldi -- Antiwar.com
The Best Congress AIPAC Can Buy by Philip Giraldi -- Antiwar.com
Many Americans who thought that the health care debate was important must have wondered where their congressmen were in early August during the first two weeks of the House of Representatives recess. It turns out they were not hosting town hall meetings or listening to constituents because many of them were in Israel together with their spouses on a trip paid for by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Fully 13% of the entire US House of Representatives, 56 members, traveled to Israel in the largest AIPAC-sponsored fact-finding visit by American politicians ever conducted. And the leaders of the two congressional groups, 25 Republicans for a week starting on August 2nd followed by 31 Democrats beginning on August 13th, were drawn from the top ranks of their respective parties. House Minority whip Eric Cantor headed the Republican group and House Majority leader Steny Hoyer led the Democrats.
Cantor and Hoyer are longtime enthusiasts for Israel and all its works. In January, when Israel was pounding Gaza to rubble and killing over a thousand civilians, Hoyer and Cantor wrote an op-ed entitled "A Defensive War," which began with "During this difficult war in the Gaza Strip, we stand with Israel." Why? Because "Instead of building roads, bridges, schools and industry, Hamas and other terrorists wasted millions turning Gaza into an armory." Hoyer and Cantor, clearly noticing a militarization of the Gaza Strip that no else quite picked up on, also affirmed that Israel occupied the moral high ground in the conflict, "While Israel targets military combatants, Hamas aims to kill as many civilians as possible." That Hoyer and Cantor were completely wrong on this vital point as well as others, in fact reversing the truth, has never resulted in an apology or a correction of the record from either lawmaker.
And there’s more. In May 2009, Cantor and Hoyer teamed up again in a congressional letter sent to their colleagues in congress. The message described how Washington must be "both a trusted mediator and a devoted friend to Israel" because "Israel will be taking the greatest risks in any peace agreement." AIPAC couldn’t have put it better. In fact, AIPAC wrote the missive since Cantor and Hoyer apparently needed a little help to get the message just right. The actual source of the letter was revealed when the document was circulated with the file name "AIPAC Letter Hoyer Cantor May 2009.pdf," which the intrepid congressional duo had failed to change before sending out.
The August congressional junkets were paid for by the American Israel Education Foundation, which is a non-profit foundation that is part of AIPAC. The non-profit foundation part means that the trip to convince already acquiescent congressmen that Israel needs more aid and special treatment was more-or-less subsidized by the US taxpayer. Barack Obama that he should not pressure Israel in any way or he will face bipartisan opposition, opposition that he will not be able to overcome. It appears that Obama might have already received the message loud and clear if the rumors that he will harden his line on Iran and soften his approach to Tel Aviv to permit Israeli settlement expansion are true.
The current Israeli government line as regurgitated by AIPAC is an attempt, aided and abetted by the congressional visitors, to shift the narrative. According to AIPAC and Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, the settlements have nothing to do with the issue of negotiating peace so Israel should be able to continue to expand its occupation of Arab East Jerusalem without any restraint while permitting "natural growth" in the other West Bank settlements. Israel claims to be willing to talk peace with the Palestinians while decrying that there is no one to talk to. Tel Aviv and its cheerleaders in Washington insist that the real threat to peace in the Middle East is Iran, which is seeking a nuclear weapon and will use it to bomb Israel and arm terrorists to attack the United States.
Eric Cantor was fully on-message, prepping his group by writing an op-ed for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz on August 3rd. He wrote that "Israel is not only a democratic ally and our only true friend in the Middle East; it is also a vital pillar of US national security strategy…Israel has a right to accommodate the natural growth of its population…excessive handwringing over natural growth is a diversion from the main threat in the Middle East: Iran." If the line sounds familiar, it should as it is straight out of Israel and AIPAC’s playbook garnished with its ridiculous pretense that Israel is some kind of strategic asset and an "eternal friend".
Cantor and Hoyer’s lawmaker colleagues apparently benefited greatly from their travels, which included a visit to the illegal West Bank settlement of Alfei Menashe to express solidarity with the heroic and widely misunderstood Israeli settlers. According to Cantor there should not be any confusion about who is doing what to whom in the Middle East. In describing the purpose of the trip, he noted that his Republican colleagues were eager to learn about "…the challenges on the ground in the Middle East, especially those challenges faced by Israel." He then returned to his script, describing the situation in more detail and expressing his concern about the "…focus being placed on settlements and settlement growth when the real threat is the existential threat that Israel faces from Iran and the impending nuclearization of Iran."
During the trip itself, Cantor could hardly shut up about how much he loves Israel and its policies, no matter what those policies are. When two Arab families were evicted from their homes in Jerusalem, resulting in a worldwide protest that included criticism from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Cantor discovered another way to look at the situation. He complained about Clinton, "I’m very troubled by that, because I don’t think we in America would want another country telling us how to implement and execute our laws."
Cantor’s travelmates evidently agreed with his rosy view of all things Israeli. Steve Scalise marveled at "all the things that the people of Israel have been through," while Louie Gohmert pressed Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad for a commitment to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, apparently oblivious to the fact that the status of a Muslim or a Christian in a Jewish state would be somewhat precarious. Leonard Lance called for working together against Iran while Mike Coffman noted that the Obama Administration failed to comprehend "the magnitude of this threat of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons." Perhaps Coffman and Lance should read some of the intelligence that the US government produces at great expense which reveals that Iran has no nuclear weapons program.
Congressman Pete Olson reported that he had known in "his head" how important the relationship with Israel was and, after three days, knew it also in his heart. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who has been to Israel seven times and is the author of numerous pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian resolutions in the House, called Israel "our US ally against the violent extremists" and twittered to her constituents a gushing account of her "amazing dinner with soldiers of the Israeli Defense Forces. Courageous young men…"
Hoyer, who has been to Israel a dozen times, led the cheerleading for the Democrats. The House Majority leader contradicted his own party’s president in finding that the settlements were not a "big issue" hindering a peace agreement, noting that they should be a "subject of negotiations." The real problem for Hoyer was completely predictably the Palestinians, specifically the "unwillingness of Abbas to sit down now." Hoyer also declared Jerusalem to be a "unified city" under Israeli control and reiterated Congressman’s Gohmert’s demand that the Palestinians recognized Israel as a Jewish State, neither of which is US policy. Shelly Berkley, who has never met an Israeli she didn’t like, put it more bluntly, "The goals of this trip are to express Congress’s solidarity with the State of Israel and to find out what Israel’s needs are." Representative Kendrick Meek welcomed his opportunity to visit Israel to help him "make better decisions as a member of congress."
President George Washington counseled explicitly against getting involved in the quarrels of foreign nations. What would he think of Hoyer and Cantor and the drones that followed them to Israel on a "fact finding" trip paid for by the Israel Lobby? Words like "disloyalty" come to mind immediately, but the AIPAC trips targeting congress are signs of a deeper problem. Many congressmen undoubtedly display knee-jerk support for Israel either because it is career enhancing or because they are afraid not to. Those who truly believe that Israel’s interests are of paramount importance and that the United States ought to go to war on its behalf should perhaps find another line of work. If they retain even a shred of decency and love of country, it is time for Cantor, Hoyer and others like them to go away. They should leave quietly but do so quickly. The well-being of the United States and its citizens demands it.
Americans Are Pissed At An Obamanation Socialization of The Economy...
Thousands of people protesting what they call out-of-control government spending are marching to the U.S. Capitol in downtown Washington. (Sept. 12)
Who Are The Real Terrorists? by Mohammed A. Hegazi
An Arab blogger gets the big picture of world affairs through a Khazarian point-of-veiw:
Why the coverup?
If the crime of 911 is exposed, so would be the crimes of the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It is that simple. This is why Obama would never have the guts to re-examine 911, regardless of the striking facts that require re-investigation.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
WHO ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS?
Throw this question at the average American simpleton and you would get his spontaneous emphatic reply:
The terrorists are those evil Moslems and Arabs.
Why do you get such erroneous absurd reply?
It is because of the continual bombardment of these simple unsophisticated minds by the evil Jewish mass media. In reality, all those Moslems and Arabs that you see wandering in their funny cumbersome garb are simple people who harbour no evil feelings towards others. They are too busy trying to understand the vague metaphoric nuances of their own benign mysterious religion.When extremist Jews or Christians discuss Islam, they pick on the harsh metaphoric stance Moslems are instructed to take against their enemies, when the latter mount a war against them.
As such, media Jews have depicted Moslems as untrustworthy blood-thirsty people. You would find similar harsh statements in the old and new testaments, if you look hard enough, not to mention the evil Talmud, which is an indictment of its own followers.
But who are the real terrorists?
But who are the real terrorists?
They are those American, British and European Jews who are running the affairs of the US, UK and most of Europe. They are those power-hungry quasi-human people who mounted devastating wars on innocent people, after advancing fabricated pretexts for war.
After almost a decade since the MOSSAD-CIA-CHENEY gang planned and executed the tragedy of 911, many simple-minded people in this world do still believe that the cave-dweller Osama Bin Laden was the culprit. It is a shame that only about 70 thousand inhabitants of New York are taking legal action to have 911 properly investigated, while all informed people can find the truth about 911 via a simple push of a computer button. Here is one Internet link of hundreds, if not thousands of links that offer you indelible proof that the US government has been, and still is, involved in a massive coverup of the crime of 911.
After almost a decade since the MOSSAD-CIA-CHENEY gang planned and executed the tragedy of 911, many simple-minded people in this world do still believe that the cave-dweller Osama Bin Laden was the culprit. It is a shame that only about 70 thousand inhabitants of New York are taking legal action to have 911 properly investigated, while all informed people can find the truth about 911 via a simple push of a computer button. Here is one Internet link of hundreds, if not thousands of links that offer you indelible proof that the US government has been, and still is, involved in a massive coverup of the crime of 911.
Why the coverup?
If the crime of 911 is exposed, so would be the crimes of the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It is that simple. This is why Obama would never have the guts to re-examine 911, regardless of the striking facts that require re-investigation.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Wikipedia says Obama born in Kenya....
Wikipedia says Obama born in Kenya
Online encyclopedia can't make up its mind on president's birthplace
Posted: July 12, 2009
11:35 pm EasternBy Joe Kovacs
© 2009 WorldNetDailyWikipedia just can't seem to make up its mind about where President Barack Obama was born.
The free, online encyclopedia written and edited entirely by its users this weekend displayed at least two countries the commander in chief may have been born in – the United States and Kenya.
WND documented how the entry for the "Early life and career of Barack Obama" changed numerous times.
This afternoon at 4:45 p.m. Eastern, Wikipedia said:
"Barack Obama, the current President of the United States, was born on August 4, 1961 in either Honolulu, in the state of Hawaii[1], or Mombasa, Kenya, to Barack Obama, Sr. (1936–1982) (born in Nyang’oma Kogelo, Siaya District, Nyanza Province,[2] Kenya Colony, British Empire), and Ann Dunham (1942–1995) (born in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas).[3][4] On his mother's side he has a half-sister; on his father's side, Obama has two half-sisters and five surviving half-brothers.[5]"
WND screenshot of Wikipedia entry on the Early life and career of Barack Obama at 4:45 p.m. ET on Sunday, July 12, 2009 :More Here Sunday, September 6, 2009
Far-Right Zionistic Jewish Israeli Nationalists to Build More Settlement Homes in West Bank....
Notice a pattern here? The jews are trying to eradicate the Palestinians from their homelands, by crowding them out through jewish over-settlements and putting the Palestinians behind fences. Kind of like a Middle Eastern gulag, right?
Jews are going into another land grabbing phase from the Palestinians:
Israel to Build More Settlement Homes in West Bank
Days before President Obama's Middle East envoy George Mitchell returns to the region to discuss an Israeli settlement freeze, news has emerged of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's intention to approve hundreds more homes in the occupied territories.
Only after that would he be willing to agree to what one Israeli official speaking to ABC News, called a "moratorium" of a few months on further construction.
The move is likely to dismay the Palestinians and the Arab world who have insisted on a complete settlement freeze as a condition to restarting peace talks with Israel.....
The senior Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat told ABC News today, "This is a direct and flagrant provocation by the Israeli side. It is likely to undermine all the efforts of the Obama administration to make peace in the region."Found Here Report Names Worst Highways in U.S. ,,,,
So much for the "Obama bailouts helping" America:
Report Names Worst Highways in U.S.
A new report on U.S. highways, released just as families across the country hit the road for Labor Day weekend, found that the nation's highways and bridges are in rough shape, with New Jersey having the worst roads.
Trucks and cars drive down the New Jersey Turnpike in this Feb. 2005 file photo, in Elizabeth, N.J. New Jersey has the worst roads in the nation, with 28.2% percent of the stateâ??s roads categorized as being in poor condition.(Mario Tama/Getty Images)
For motorists living in a state with poor roads that means more travel delays, higher driving costs and a greater risk of being injured.
"It can amount to several hundreds of dollars a year in additional costs when you're driving on bad roads," said David Goldberg,a spokesperson for Transportation for America, the Washington, D.C., group that focuses on state-by-state transportation statistics.
(Another jew lobbyist in D.C.)
You can thank the crooks in D.C. for this mess.More Here Saturday, September 5, 2009
The Eiffel Tower "Dressed Up" Like A Turkish Flag...
Nicolas Sarkozy (jew president of France) flip-flopping on the issue on weather or not to admit Turkey to the EU:And it is on the occasion of this celebration of Turkey that the Eiffel Tower will be lit up with the colors of the Turkish flag in October. That's right. The Eiffel Tower will be adorned with the white star and crescent on a red background. Turkey will have, in fact, one foot in Europe. And the mayor of Paris will roll out the red carpet. Frédéric Mitterand, Minister of Culture, acknowledges this and has given his blessing to such a sacrilege."Discussion Here Kiddie Fiddler to be ordained by Louisville church, many concerned...
<(Reported by McKinley of Kentckyanna True News.)
Pedophile pervert to be ordained by Louisville fag church, many locals concerned:
This sick bastard sodomized, sexually abusing and intimidating an 11 year old boy.
Most of the church goers are gay or transgendered.
Registered sex offender to be ordained by Louisville church, many concerned
September 4th, 2009
The pastor of City of Refuge Worship Center admits it's the first time he's heard of a church in the United States ordaining someone who is registered for life as a sex offender but he says the man in question has changed and deserves forgiveness.
VIDEO:
http://www.whas11.com/video/index.html?nvid=395583">"Discussion Here Friday, September 4, 2009
Perturbed Parents Pull Their Children Out Of Classes Before Obama Speaks....
Parents Pull Their Childern From Schools Before An Obongo Speech...Some Parents Oppose Obama Speech to Students
HOUSTON — President Obama’s plan to deliver a speech to public school students on Tuesday has set off a revolt among " 'Kwan"conservative parents, who have accused the president of trying to indoctrinate their children with socialist ideas and are asking school officials to excuse the children from listening.
The uproar over the speech, in which Mr. Obama intends to urge students to work hard and stay in school, has been particularly acute in Texas, where several major school districts, under pressure from parents, have laid plans to let children opt out of lending the president an ear.
Some parents said they were concerned because the speech had not been screened for political content. Nor, they said, had it been reviewed by the State Board of Education and local school boards, which, under state law, must approve the curriculum.
“The thing that concerned me most about it was it seemed like a direct channel from the president of the United States into the classroom, to my child,” said Brett Curtiss, an engineer from Pearland, Tex., who said he would keep his three children home.
“I don’t want our schools turned over to some socialist movement.”
The White House has said the speech will emphasize the importance of education and hard work in school, both to the individual and to the nation. The message is not partisan, nor compulsory, officials said.
“This isn’t a policy speech,” said Sandra Abrevaya, a spokeswoman for the Department of Education. “It’s designed to encourage kids to stay in school. The choice on whether to show the speech to students is entirely in the hands of each school. This is absolutely voluntary.”
Mr. Obama’s speech was announced weeks ago, but the furor among conservatives reached a fever pitch Wednesday morning as right-wing Web sites and talk show hosts began inveighing against it.
Mark Steyn (?), a Canadian author and political commentator, speaking on the Rush Limbaugh show on Wednesday, accused Mr. Obama of trying to create a cult of personality, comparing him to Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong-il, the North Korean leader.
The Republican Party chairman in Florida, Jim Greer, said he “was appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama’s socialist ideology.”
And Chris Stigall, a Kansas City talk show host, said, “I wouldn’t let my next-door neighbor talk to my kid alone; I’m sure as hell not letting Barack Obama talk to him alone.”
Previous presidents have visited public schools to speak directly to students, although few of those events have been broadcast live. Mr. Obama’s address at noon, Eastern time, at a high school in Virginia, will be streamed live on the White House Web site.
The first President George Bush, a Republican, made a similar nationally broadcast speech from a Washington high school in 1991, urging students to study hard, avoid drugs and to ignore peers “who think it’s not cool to be smart.” Democrats in Congress accused him of using taxpayer money — $27,000 to produce the broadcast — for “paid political advertising.”
This week, school officials were hearing from parents about the issue not only in Texas, but in other parts of the country as well — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, South Carolina and Utah.
Herb Garrett, executive director of the Georgia School Superintendents Association, said many of his members felt that the controversy had put them in an awkward situation, vulnerable to attacks from "'Kwan"conservative talk-show hosts if they open up instructional time for Mr. Obama’s speech, and open to accusations that they have disrespected the president if they do not.
“It’s one of those no-wins,” Mr. Garrett said.
In Texas, calls and e-mail messages flooded into the offices of many local school officials. “I didn’t get a positive call all day,” said Susan Dacus, a spokeswoman for the Wylie Independent School District outside Dallas.
School officials in Wylie decided to record the speech, review it and then let individual teachers show it, offering students the opportunity to avoid listening if they wished.
In Houston, teachers have been asked to tell parents if they intend to show the speech and the schools will provide an alternative class for those whose parents object, a spokesman for the district, Lee Vela, said.
Some Houston parents, however, said telling children they should not hear out the president of the United States, even if their parents dislike his policies, sends the wrong message — that one should not listen to someone with whom you disagree.
“It’s difficult for me to understand how listening to the president, the commander in chief, the chief citizen of this country, is damaging to the youth of today,” said Phyllis Griffin Epps, an analyst for the city who has two children in public school.Found Here with a comment section
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
